The most powerful dictator in the world, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), is visiting Europe, making three stops.
China’s objective for Europe is clear: Ensure that Europe would not put up strong resistance in the form of EU sectoral sanctions to Chinese hostilities against democracies in East Asia, such as Taiwan, Japan or the Philippines. French, Hungarian and Serbian leaders would be helping him out, because of their questionable strategies, local corruption needs and general ignorance of global security. Despite European economic and political stability depending on peace in the Taiwan Strait, many European leaders are doing nothing to deter China’s aggression and are instead feeding the Chinese war machine.
Driven by anti-Americanism, a hurt ego as a former superpower, a naive appeasement strategy and the greed of several French companies, French President Emmanuel Macron would again kneel to the Chinese president. He would make a few nice speeches about principles, but instead of pressuring China with EU sectoral sanctions to force it to stop its support of the Russian war, he would cheer another set of dirty money contracts. This would deepen European economic dependence on the will of the Chinese Communist Party instead of decreasing it, which is the EU policy of de-risking.
Macron might again throw other democracies under the bus to please Xi and damage the transatlantic alliance even more, like he did after his last trip to Beijing. As an example, France is happy to sell military-use helicopters to China, which can be used to transport Chinese solders to butcher Taiwanese defenders, the scenario Beijing is systematically preparing for.
France knows about the Chinese war build-up and still signs large contracts boosting Chinese military capabilities. It is no surprise that France is actively sabotaging NATO efforts to cooperate with Japan, a regional democratic leader in the Indo-Pacific and a natural ally of Europe.
Why is Macron doing it? There are only two options: Either it is a part of his dirty deal with the Chinese president (France blocks NATO cooperation with Japan in exchange for Chinese contracts for French companies) or it is just pure appeasement — a failed strategy France did on Russia for years until it completely collapsed and enabled the Russian war in Ukraine, since Moscow interpreted it as European weakness.
In Serbia, President Aleksandar Vucic, a known puppet of Russia, would be asking for more dirty Chinese money. He is happy to sell out Serbian sovereignty by allowing more Chinese police (effectively Chinese intelligence) into Serbia to give them an entry point to Europe. Serbia already serves as a Russian and Chinese intelligence base against other Balkan states, so Vucic would just be re-kissing the ring of Xi. With Serbia having no real chance of getting into EU or NATO, its usefulness for Chinese geopolitical plans is limited.
Loyal Russian servant Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is the best ally of Chinese communists in Europe, already speaking and voting on their behalf in the EU. Hungary serves as a Russian and Chinese intelligence base for wider Central Europe. It hosts many Chinese espionage cover organizations, such as a branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (led by a senior China-affiliated spy) and the largest Huawei research and development branch outside China. Orban would happily allow more Chinese police (meaning Chinese intelligence) inside this NATO member state and beg for more dirty money contracts for the Belgrade-Budapest railway to fund oligarchs and proxies.
Jakub Janda is the Director of European Values Center for Security, headquartered in Prague. It is so far the only European think tank with a permanent office in Taiwan.
For decades, the US and Taiwan have focused on shoring up Taiwan’s military defenses against a potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) invasion. However, a new report by the American Enterprise Institute and the Institute for the Study of War, From Coercion to Capitulation: How China Can Take Taiwan Without War, explores alternative Chinese strategies. The report says that China could employ non-military methods such as threats, coercion and isolation to pressure Taiwan into submission. This highlights a potential gap in US strategy, suggesting a need to consider approaches beyond solely strengthening Taiwan’s military. Former US president Donald Trump and US President
Taiwan will once again be forced to compete in the Olympics this summer under a nonsensical moniker that neither refers to any political reality nor the identity of its team. Rather, Taiwan competes under “Chinese Taipei,” a Chinese construction imposed on Taiwanese without consultation. “Chinese Taipei” is the sole Olympic team not reflecting the name used by its own people. Even territories such as Puerto Rico, Hong Kong and the Virgin Islands are allowed to use their own names and flags. Other partially recognized states such as Israel, Kosovo and Palestine compete as themselves. “Chinese Taipei” includes athletes from Kaohsiung, Tainan,
One day after President William Lai (賴清德) was sworn in, tens of thousands of citizens gathered outside the Legislative Yuan, as legislators held a highly contentious session inside the building. Protesters decried the two major opposition parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), whose combined seats in the legislature outnumber that of Lai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — for sponsoring several bills that are widely viewed as unconstitutional, financially and environmentally unsustainable or a threat to privacy rights. Equally objectionable in the eyes of many civic groups was the disregard for due process, as
The scuffles on the legislative floor on Friday last week over the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) forcing controversial legislation through to the next reading were embarrassing for the nation, but they were hardly unprecedented, and it is important not to fixate on them. Far more pernicious things are happening in the background. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus was fiercely opposed to the KMT’s and TPP’s antics. Objections and concerns have been expressed in many quarters, including international academics, the Taiwan Bar Association, local legal academics and the public. Protesters gathered outside the Legislative